God hates Higgs bosonīackward causation is, in Holger Bech Nielsens own words, »influence going from future to past«.Īccording to his theory, LHC and the Higgs boson particle it is meant to create might be so abhorrent to nature that its creation would ripple backward through time and stop the collider before it could make one, like a time-traveller who goes back in time to kill his own grandfather. However, two respected physicists, one of them the University of Copenhagen’s Holger Bech Nielsen, have added fuel to the sci-fi nerds’ inferno, by claiming that ‘backward causation’ could be at the root of the LHC’s numerous ‘accidental’ system failures.įurthermore, they have backed up their hypothesis with apparently sound mathematical theory. Most researchers and physics buffs with an ounce of theoretical knowledge have scoffed into their lab coats at such speculations. Most notable is the idea that the LHC could create a black hole which could swallow the Earth, or, more dramatically, destroy the entire Universe. Since its conception the LHC has been the subject of numerous sci-fi doomsday theories. This is according to the British news website .uk. Now, University of Copenhagen physicist Holger Bech Nielsen claims that the machine’s run of bad luck may be down to a ‘back-to-the-future’ effect, whereby the machine is doomed to failure by its own future. In the following, she directed the Particle Physics Division at the French Atomic Energy Commission, CEA-Irfu between 20, before being appointed Scientific Director for Particle Physics and Computing at IN2P3 and becoming deputy director of the institute between 20.Helium leakages, power outages and year-long magnet repairs must make Large Hadron Collider (LHC) the world’s most costly and ill-fated experiment.
She participated to international collaborations with several hundreds of scientists at particle colliders in Germany (HERA at DESY, Hamburg) and the United States (Tevatron at Fermilab, close to Chicago). After her PhD, obtained in 1993 at the Pierre et Marie Curie University in Paris, her research activities have been dedicated in particular to the study of the proton structure and the properties of the top quark, as well as to the instruments necessary to this research field.
Ursula Bassler, research director at CNRS – France, is currently President of the CERN Council, the European Organization for Nuclear Research in Geneva, and adviser for diversity and scientific impact at the French National Institute of Nuclear and Particle Physics (IN2P3). As Jeremy Farrar puts it, our quest to probe the laws of nature is “something akin to a modern Enlightenment.” Pursuing the fundamental research concerning the next European particle accelerator brings together nations around the world and inspires future generations of scientists of all disciplines. Many of the most profound impacts, though, cannot be quantified. Particle physics has led to everything from the birth of the internet to the imaging of biological molecules, which has proven crucial in our efforts to combat the coronavirus pandemic. Such immense scientific enquiry inevitably leads to off shoots and indirect benefits.
The result would allow physicists to probe the Universe’s conditions moments after the Big Bang, expanding our understanding of the fundamental laws of nature.īut the benefits would go well beyond particle physics. But what would CERNs immense project bring to the world of science and beyond?Ī new, larger European particle accelerator would almost certainly be the most ambitious experiment ever constructed, and require truly global collaboration over the course of decades. The Next European Particle Accelerator – Does CERN Need Another Supercollider? Falling Walls Circle Tables are lending the spotlight to world-leading scientists, science strategists and policy-makers from academia, business and politics discuss how we can apply science, research and innovation to get the world moving again.Įurope is currently investigating plans to build a new 100km particle collider to supersede the world famous Large Hadron Collider (LHC).
0 kommentar(er)
